Buddha_A Very Short Introduction Page 2

RUSSELL • A. C. Grayling

  RUSSIAN LITERATURE • Catriona Kelly

  THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION • S. A. Smith

  SCHIZOPHRENIA • Chris Frith and Eve Johnstone

  SCHOPENHAUER • Christopher Janaway

  SCIENCE AND RELIGION • Thomas Dixon

  SCOTLAND • Rab Houston

  SEXUALITY • Véronique Mottier

  SHAKESPEARE • Germaine Greer

  SIKHISM • Eleanor Nesbitt

  SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY • John Monaghan and Peter Just

  SOCIALISM • Michael Newman

  SOCIOLOGY • Steve Bruce

  SOCRATES • C. C. W. Taylor

  THE SOVIET UNION • Stephen Lovell

  THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR • Helen Graham

  SPANISH LITERATURE • Jo Labanyi

  SPINOZA • Roger Scruton

  STATISTICS • David J. Hand

  STUART BRITAIN • John Morrill

  SUPERCONDUCTIVITY • Stephen Blundell

  TERRORISM • Charles Townshend

  THEOLOGY • David F. Ford

  THOMAS AQUINAS • Fergus Kerr

  TOCQUEVILLE • Harvey C. Mansfield

  TRAGEDY • Adrian Poole

  THE TUDORS • John Guy

  TWENTIETH-CENTURY BRITAIN • Kenneth O. Morgan

  THE UNITED NATIONS • Jussi M. Hanhimäki

  THE U.S. CONCRESS • Donald A. Ritchie

  UTOPIANISM • Lyman Tower Sargent

  THE VIKINGS • Julian Richards

  WITCHCRAFT • Malcolm Gaskill

  WITTGENSTEIN • A. C. Grayling

  WORLD MUSIC • Philip Bohlman

  THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION • Amrita Narlikar

  WRITING AND SCRIPT • Andrew Robinson

  AVAILABLE SOON:

  LATE ANTIQUITY • Gillian Clark

  MUHAMMAD • Jonathan A. Brown

  GENIUS • Andrew Robinson

  NUMBERS • Peter M. Higgins

  ORGANIZATIONS • Mary Jo Hatch

  VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS

  VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS are for anyone wanting a stimulating and accessible way in to a new subject. They are written by experts, and have been published in more than 25 languages worldwide.

  The series began in 1995, and now represents a wide variety of topics in history, philosophy, religion, science, and the humanities. The VSI Library now contains over 200 volumes-a Very Short Introduction to everything from ancient Egypt and Indian philosophy to conceptual art and cosmology-and will continue to grow to a library of around 300 titles.

  VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS AVAILABLE NOW

  For more information visit our web site

  www.oup.co.uk/general/vsi/

  THE BUDDHA

  A Very Short Introduction

  Michael Carrithers

  To Elizabeth

  Contents

  List of illustrations

  List of maps

  Preface

  1 Introduction

  2 Early life and renunciation

  3 To the awakening

  4 The awakening

  5 The mission and the death

  Note on quotations

  Further reading

  Index

  List of illustrations

  1 Meditating monk, Bangkok

  Photo: Henry Wilson

  2 The Buddha as an ascetic, Gandhara sculpture, second century AD

  Lahore Museum

  3 The Buddha’s death, rock carving at Ajanta, cave 26, c. sixth century AD

  Photo: Hans Hinz

  4 Forest monk with giant squirrel

  Photo by author

  5 Forest monk in Sri Lanka preaching to lay people

  Photo by author

  6 Monk being offered food by lay people after preaching

  Photo by author

  List of maps

  1 Northern India and Nepal

  Preface

  Until the last century the Buddha was probably the most influential thinker in human history. His teaching prospered throughout the subcontinent of India for more than 1500 years, and in that time it changed and diversified at least as much as Christianity did in its first 1500 years in Europe. By the thirteenth century AD, when the power of Buddhism was broken in its original home, it had long since spread to Tibet, Central Asia, China, Korea, Japan, and Sri Lanka, and it was making its way into South-East Asia. Buddhism’s history in those countries was as complicated as it had already been in India.

  I have not attempted to explain such a vast matter in this short book. I have only recounted the life of the Buddha and described the genesis and significance of his teaching. I have tried, however, to phrase this account so the reader will be able to see why Buddhism moved so easily across continents and survived so well through the centuries.

  Map 1. Northern India and Nepal.

  Chapter 1

  Introduction

  Among the ruins of Anuradhapura, the ancient capital of Sri Lanka, there rests alone on a pedestal above the grass a seated image of the Buddha in stone, slightly larger than life. The statue is conventional, probably more than a thousand years old, of a type found throughout Buddhist Asia. The legs are folded in meditation, the hands laid one upon the other in the lap. Buddhists hold that it was in this posture, seated beneath a tree more than 2500 years ago, that the Buddha was awakened, attaining decisive knowledge of the human condition and the unshakeable certainty that he was released from its suffering.

  In its excellence, however, the Anuradhapura image is far from conventional. The back and head are disciplined and upright; but the arms are relaxed and the face reposes in tranquillity. The figure seems intelligent and serene, wed perfectly to the unmoving granite. Standing before it an elderly English socialist told me that in the whole mess of human history this at least – the statue and all it stands for – was something of which we could be proud. He said that he had no use for religion, but that he felt he had unknowingly been a follower of the Buddha all along.

  An intensely private reflection, its disclosure prompted perhaps by the power of the figure: but what is remarkable is that it should be found in so many others. Here, for example, is the anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss, by no means a Buddhist, writing in a similar vein:

  what have I learnt from the masters I have listened to, the philosophers I have read, the societies I have investigated, and that very science in which the West takes such pride? Simply a fragmentary lesson or two which, if laid end to end, would add up to the meditations of the Sage at the foot of his tree.

  This testifies to the fascination the Buddha still holds for us. Is it justified? What does an Oriental seer, born in the middle of the first millennium before Christ among historical circumstances and a culture so different from our own, have to offer such very modern thinkers? This is the first question I have tried to answer.

  And I have tried to answer it by writing a biography of the Buddha. That this is a reasonable strategy is by no means obvious, for history is full of figures whose significance lies very little in their personal lives and very much in their teachings alone. But the Buddha is peculiar in this regard, for his teaching and his life are intimately and inextricably mingled.

  A brief biography

  Let me illustrate this from traditional accounts of the Buddha’s life, which have exerted tremendous influence over Buddhists and are now widely available in European languages. The Buddha was born the son of a king, and so grew up with wealth, pleasure, and the prospect of power, all goods commonly desired by human beings. As he reached manhood, however, he was confronted with a sick man, an old man, and a corpse. He had lived a sheltered life, and these affected him profoundly, for he realized that no wealth or power could prevent him too from experiencing illness, old age, and death. He also saw a wandering ascetic, bent on escaping these sufferings. Reflecting on what he had seen, he reached the first great turning-point of his life: against the wishes of his family he renounced home, wife, child, and position to become
a homeless wanderer, seeking release from this apparently inevitable pain.

  For some years he practised the trance-like meditation, and later the strenuous self-mortification, which were then current among such wanderers, but he found these ineffective. So he sat down to reflect quietly, with neither psychic nor physical rigours, on the common human plight. This led to the second great change in his life, for out of this reflection in tranquillity arose at last awakening and release. He had ‘done what was to be done’, he had solved the enigma of suffering. Deriving his philosophy from his experience he then taught for forty-five years, and his teaching touched most problems in the conduct of human life. He founded an order of monks who were to free themselves by following his example, and they spread his teaching abroad in the world. He eventually died of mortal causes, like others, but unlike others he was ‘utterly extinguished’ (parinibbuto), for he would never be reborn to suffer again.

  There are good reasons to doubt even this very compressed account, but at least the outline of the life must be true: birth, maturity, renunciation, search, awakening and liberation, teaching, death. This biography, with the two marked transformations, the renunciation and the awakening, gave the Buddha and his followers the dramatic plot with which to illustrate their belief and the psychological and philosophical model on which to found their thought. Dramatically the action centres on spiritual changes achieved by heroic personal application, while philosophically it centres on discoveries made within the Buddha’s own mind and body.

  Hence he said, ‘it is within this fathom-long carcass, with its mind and its notions, that I declare there is the world, the origin of the world, the cessation of the world, and the path leading to the cessation of the world’ (S I 62). Within these bounds what he suffered was suffered in common with all mortal beings. For all mortals, in his words, ‘birth is suffering, ageing is suffering, sickness is suffering.’ In his view these inescapable and pressing facts were discoverable by anyone through introspection into their own experience. Similarly the means of release were available to everyone. The meditation methods which he developed, for example, are based on such simple and available phenomena as one’s own breathing. The morality he espoused was founded in clear and practical principles derived from his own life. The Buddha’s laboratory was himself, and he generalized his findings to cover all human beings.

  So the second question is, how did the Buddha change and develop? For it is this development which is, in one way or another, the subject of his philosophy. It is a question which has been of central concern to Buddhists, and it is one which the Buddha himself frequently answered. Sometimes he answered it directly by recounting part of his life. Elsewhere he answered it indirectly by stating that if one did X, then the following deleterious consequences would ensue, but if one did Y, then the consequences would be wholesome and conducive to liberation. Behind this lay the assumption that the Buddha knew this because he had witnessed the alternatives. He required of himself, as of his monks, adherence to one rule of evidence: ‘that which you affirm [must be] that which you have realized, seen, known for yourself’ (M I 265).

  It does not follow from the autobiographical nature of the Buddha’s philosophy, however, that an account of the Buddha alone would be adequate to explain it. For despite his taste for solitude he was part of his society and its history. He lived amid great and decisive social and intellectual changes, changes whose fruits he inherited and to whose further course he contributed substantially. His thought was revolutionary, but it was a revolution which had already been in the making for a long time. The image I have in mind is that of a wave of change which built up slowly, over centuries, touching every aspect of the lives of the ancient Indians. The Buddha was elevated to the crest of this wave, and he enjoyed a wide view across human affairs. The problem is to assess how much of his vision he owed to his elevation, to his position in history and to the work of his predecessors and contemporaries, and how much to the keenness of his own sight.

  The sources

  What evidence do we possess to recount the life and circumstances of a man who lived 2500 years ago? For the life of the Buddha we rely almost entirely on the Buddhist scriptures, preserved in many oriental languages, which have at least the advantage of being very extensive. Those portions which are oldest and which most narrowly concern the Buddha, the Basket of Discourses (Suttapiṭaka) and the Basket of the Disciplinary Code (Vinayapiṭaka), take up several library shelves in their various versions. Most of these, furthermore, are represented as being utterances of the Buddha, each spoken on a particular occasion in a particular place. The intention of the Buddha’s followers was evidently to preserve the actual words of their teacher in their historical setting.

  How well did they achieve this intention? Let us look first at the formation of the Buddhist canon. The canonical discourses take various forms: sometimes they are dialogues into which the Buddha entered with followers of other teachings; sometimes they are answers to specific questions brought to him by his own monks; sometimes they are lessons directed to his monks; and occasionally they are sermons addressed to the laymen who did not leave their homes but were content to support those who did.

  The monks were chiefly responsible for preserving this teaching, since it was largely directed to them. The Buddha and his monks were peripatetic for much of the year, but gathered together in separate monasteries for the four months of the rainy season retreat, during the North Indian monsoon. While wandering the Buddha and his monks spread the message abroad, but while in retreat they discussed and rehearsed the teaching. Indeed, a few of the canonical discourses consist of discussions between monks. Throughout the canon are found slightly different versions of some doctrine or other, and this is no doubt partly attributable to elaborations at the hands of the monks, either during the Buddha’s lifetime or after his death. But it also seems likely that the Buddha sometimes changed or improved his teachings, and that the dispersal of the monks allowed both earlier and later versions to be preserved among them, each in a different place.

  It was after the Buddha’s death that the real work of preservation began. The monks probably held a council shortly after that event, and almost certainly another was held a century later. At these councils they made an effort to establish or authenticate the then extant accounts of the life and teaching of the Buddha, and they were aware of systematic rules governing the acceptance or rejection of a discourse as authentic. Moreover the monks brought to the task of preservation a number of devices. They adopted from the culture around them or developed themselves methods of recitation and memorization. They gave many of the discourses a repetitious and formulaic shape, which facilitated such memorization. They used poetry, which was probably sung – though the Buddha may have already done this as well. And, most important, they divided the discourses into distinct but largely overlapping bodies of material, each of which became the responsibilities of certain monks to memorize and pass on. The scriptures were not written down until three or four hundred years after the death of the Buddha, but these oral and social methods ensured that his words were probably kept better than our print-bound culture would recognize.

  This is not to say that the canonical materials are wholly faithful. Some of the Buddha’s words were lost, others misunderstood. Some became formulae which were repeated in inappropriate contexts. Moreover the monks added a good deal themselves, and in particular the figure of the Buddha tended to be magnified. Indeed none of the languages in which the canon now appears was the language of the Buddha himself, whatever it was, though one of them, Pali, is probably very close to it. From internal evidence it seems certain that these oldest texts had crystallized into roughly the shape in which we have them by the time of the second council or shortly thereafter. So at best we can hope to see the Buddha about as well as did his own disciples three generations after his death.

  However, it took many Western scholars, working for more than a century, to conclude this much. For some
time not too long after the second council the Buddhist order was riven by schisms, and as each group moved apart it preserved the old texts, but rearranged them. And indeed the principle throughout Buddhist history was that, whatever rearrangements occurred, nothing was discarded. But to the old material different schools added new material, and the now expanded canons of each group represented different emphases, and new doctrines, in one or other of the related North Indian languages of Pali, Sanskrit, or one of the Prakrits. These ancient developments took place within the Indian subcontinent, and of this period are preserved in an Indian language only the Pali canon in its entirety and some fragments in the other languages.